Saturday, September 6, 2014
Folks, a country that doesn’t
have good expertise in doing productive foreign relations work can’t impress or
attract other countries to do business with it. And without any productive
relationship with other countries, how can such a country sell itself? No
amount of re-branding ventures will serve its purposes. That is why countries
establish foreign missions and spend huge sums of money maintaining them. By their
fruit will they be known. Ghana’s missions abroad are nothing but deadwood.
Ghana is known for its
penetration into other parts of the world, establishing links with any country
at all that it sees as a likely productive partner. The missions so established
are expected to do much for the country’s benefit. Some missions are regarded
as more important than others. Take the missions in the United States, the
United Kingdom, Russia, Germany, France, Italy, for instance, and you will know
why those appointed as Ambassadors and High Commissioners there regard
themselves as more “powerful” or “luckier” than their colleagues assigned to
Burkina Faso, South Sudan, Nicaragua, Panama, or Lesotho.
For reasons best known to the
appointing authority, choosing Ambassadors and High Commissioners to do Ghana’s
foreign relations work is demanding. How about the intensive lobbying going on
and the need to put in place those who can do the bidding?