Tuesday,
May 22, 2012
We
insist that the Supreme Court’s ruling that the NPP’s Jake Obetsebi-Lamptey did
no wrong in acquiring a state bungalow is appalling. It is disappointing and
will go a long way to encourage thievery at the highest level and to the most frantic
extent unless something else happens to curb it. The verdict has set a
horrendous precedent that we must explore further.
Bad Precedent Number Four:
And
here comes the most annoying aspect of the decision, which says that “the
former erstwhile Kufuor appointee did not abuse any law of the land by
purchasing the house.”
Of
course, the Supreme Court might be focusing on “abuse of law” but it is obvious
that we have no such law against acquisition of property. Fair enough. But what
makes sense is that a government functionary occupying a state property must
not use his position to acquire that property. What will happen if all government
appointees rush to acquire state property at their disposal? Does the country
have the resources to provide such property? And should public property be so (mis)appropriated
at will?
