Friday,
March 28, 2014
Folks, we are doomed already.
Despite much public agitations against the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between West Africa and
the European Union (EU), the West African sub-regional group ECOWAS says it is
satisfied with it (the EPA).
The chairman of the Council of Ministers and the Chairman of the ECOWAS Commission (Kadré Désiré Ouedraogo) say they are “very pleased” with the agreement. Ouedraogo even believes that the agreement will be advantageous for the West African sub-region.
The chairman of the Council of Ministers and the Chairman of the ECOWAS Commission (Kadré Désiré Ouedraogo) say they are “very pleased” with the agreement. Ouedraogo even believes that the agreement will be advantageous for the West African sub-region.
He
did not tell us what those advantages might be. But we know that the opponents
of the EPA have raised very cogent reasons and arguments to prove that the EPA
won’t help us solve any problem. It will rather deepen our woes.
Against
this background, it is disheartening to be told by our own government that
Ghana will support the ECOWAS position.
Strictly speaking, the government’s
stance on EPA is flawed and inadmissible. In plain language, the EPA is not
meant for regional or sub-regional blocs of countries. It is designed to affect
a country on its own merit and countries individually and not collectively.
Evidence (even in the
technicality of the EPA itself) abounds to confirm my viewpoint:
“The
EPAs are legally binding bilateral contracts between the European Union (EU)
and individual African countries. Once signed, EPAs warrant that within
two decades, about 80% of that country’s market should open to European goods
and services tariff-free. The European Parliament has granted the African
countries an extension until October 2014 to ratify their interim EPAs.”
So, what is this mischievous
claim by Ms. Hannah Tetteh (Foreign
Affairs Minister) that “we can’t have a single country position. That is the whole thing about
having a regional agreement. We must have a regional consensus… it’s not a
question of what is Ghana’s stance because this is an ECOWAS decision. Either
we all agree or we don’t agree”?
(Source:
http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=304593)
Folks,
do you see how selling out a country is easy, especially when the leaders of
that country take premeditated positions on crucial issues like this EPA?
Reasons
given by opponents of this EPA are persuasive and cannot be dismissed as the
workings of dangerous minds. They are clear that the EPA doesn’t have anything
good for us but is just an avenue being created by the greedy former colonizers
to dump their goods on us.
Their
agenda is clear: to stifle local initiative and expand their own reach to our
markets. They are known for imposing strict regulations on how their own
markets should function. Trade protectionism is rampant, and African countries
seeking to enter those markets can’t make any headway.
They
have even extended their draconian measures beyond economic activities to
affect immigration. Just consider the austerity measures and high fees that
they impose on African countries in terms of visa requests by their nationals
wishing to travel to any EU country, especially the United Kingdom and France.
The
daily agonies of African migrants seeking entry into Europe are enough evidence
that these European powers will never do anything to favour Africa.
This
EPA is negative and shouldn’t be supported at all. Unfortunately, though, our
ECOWAS leaders are blind and deaf. They have already been bought to sing the
master’s song and will drag all of us along with them to our doom.
Considering
the failures of this ECOWAS itself, what is the justification for depending on
it to push its member countries into the den of these insatiable, heartless,
and marauding European vampires? Have our leaders all too soon forgotten the
aggression and subtleties with which these very European forces scrambled for
and partitioned Africa for easy exploitation?
And
now, in this 21st century, they cannot think deeply about issues,
particularly the need for economic agreements to boost intra-African business
transactions on their own terms for mutual benefits instead of rushing into the
arms of these European vampires to sell their countries out?
Considering
the constraint that “the EPAs are legally binding bilateral contracts”, can’t
our ECOWAS leaders foresee the danger ahead? And why can’t they use their heads
to know why the EU hasn’t moved the EPAs to other African regional or
sub-regional groups but ECOWAS?
Why
are our leaders so malleable, shortsighted, and docile to be so regarded as
marionettes on strings readied for pulling?
I
am quite certain that signing this EPA will provoke agitations all over the
sub-region and may eventually erode public confidence and goodwill for these
leaders. They have a huge price to pay at election time, especially when the
negative impact of the EPA begins being felt before any general elections are
held.
One
might even be tempted to conclude that the ECOWAS is irrelevant and can’t be
relied on to promote anything substantial for our good. It is a mere talk-shop,
an avenue for hot-headed but misguided political rhetoric. Pathetic!!
I shall return…
·
E-mail:
mjbokor@yahoo.com
·
Join
me on Facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/mjkbokor to continue the conversation.
No comments:
Post a Comment