Monday,
April 20, 2015
Folks, you must have heard
reports that a group of “senior lecturers” at the Kwame Nkrumah University of
Science and Technology (KNUST) supporting the NPP have come together to do what
they think will boost the NPP’s electoral chances at Election 2016.
Calling themselves “KNUST NPP Frontliners”, the group has
the goal of helping the opposition party to offer policy alternatives and ideas
to help improve the country’s socio-economic development.
“Our
main aim is to organize KNUST NPP faithful who will serve as a think-tank ready
to serve the party to win power in 2016 and beyond,” stated Dr. Kwabena Boadu,
Chairman of group at the inaugural ceremony.
“Our vision is to be recognized as an elite group of supporters to influence policy direction. Our mission is to serve as an interface between the party and the electorate in explaining party policies and canvassing for votes”.(See: http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=355220).
“Our vision is to be recognized as an elite group of supporters to influence policy direction. Our mission is to serve as an interface between the party and the electorate in explaining party policies and canvassing for votes”.(See: http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=355220).
As
is to be expected, none other but the Executive
Director of the Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Prof.
Gyimah Boadi, who is reported to have made a strong case in support of these lecturers
who want to do partisan politics. (See http://www.myjoyonline.com/politics/2015/April-20th/cdd-boss-welcomes-partisan-lecturers.php#sthash.SZZHjiLH.dpuf)
I unreservedly condemn such a
move because it is unethical and dangerous to the university community at
several levels. The lecturers were hired to lecture and not to do partisan
politics, which is why the university authorities must act expeditiously to
clip their wings before they cause any havoc. Not that their activities will
change anything that has prevented the NPP and its Akufo-Addo from winning the 2008
and 2012 general elections.
There is nothing that these NPP
lecturers will talk about that is not already known to Ghanaians. They love
listening to their own voices and will as usual indulge in “book politics” to
distance themselves all the more from the electorate. But their intentions
violate the norms of decency in the university setting.
I commend he KNUST Public Relations
Officer, Vincent Ankamah Lomotey, for making it clear that the group “will be
in violation of the university’s rules if they carry their activities on campus”
This group is simply setting out
to destabilize the situation at the university, clearly because it is unethical
for those in public service (let alone lecturers, be they senior or junior
staff) to engage in partisan politics, using the premises of the public
institution.
In civilized democracies, no
public official being paid from the consolidated fund can do partisan politics
in any environment as the university campus. The danger is obvious; and
sanctions should be imposed on anybody using the unive5rsity campus or
facilities to promote any partisan political agenda.
The United States’ democracy is
strong because restraints exist to check and balance human behaviour. At the
workplace (be it an educational institution, a factory, any other), no one can
engage in partisan politics. Teachers (at whatever level) cannot even identify
openly with political parties and use any space in the institution to profess
or carry out activities in pursuit of such partisan political purposes.
It is even strictly forbidden to
raise religion in the pursuit of one’s professional interests. Sanctions will
be imposed on defaulters. Thus, discipline and decency ensure that partisan
politics is not injected into goings-on. In Ghana, no restraint exists or is
enforced, which is why those lecturers at the KNUST have begun doing things
this way. Why is there no respect for decency in Ghanaian affairs?
It is clear that these NPP
lecturers have an agenda to cause mischief especially as far as the political
activities of students opposed to the NPP are concerned. I sense some agenda of
vindictiveness or plain intimidation against such non-NPP students.
In Ghanaian institutions of
higher learning where grades are known to be “sexually transmitted” (meaning
the lecturers have girlfriends among the students and favour them with
undeserved grades while punishing young men they suspect of flirting with such girlfriends),
introducing partisan politics into the equation will not serve any good purpose
for the university community.
The government must move fast and
work with the University Council to identify these NPP lecturers for punitive
action as soon as they begin their partisan politicking on campus. The
university authorities must freeze their salaries and later dismiss them if
they flout the regulations regarding their professional work (and conditions/terms
of employment).
These lecturers were hired to do
what will improve the training of students in various fields of endeavour, not
to indulge in partisan politics. They must be made to “profess” what they were
hired for. If they have found partisan politics more attractive, then, they
should be kicked out to do politics and not remain in the university’s payroll
as lecturers.
I know for sure that the empty
talker (Amoako-Baah) is a brain behind this movement. Many others wearing their
thinking caps askew are with him; and they should be monitored and kicked out
outright before they poison the environment at KNUST.
Lecturers at the other
institutions contemplating such a move will learn bitter lessons from any
punitive action taken against these NPP lecturers at KNUST.
My point is clear: Any lecturer
(public servant, for that matter) being paid from the national coffers must not
be allowed to do partisan politics. It is unethical and dangerous for the
Ghanaian situation.
Student groupings that have
identified with particular political parties also need to be circumspect in
their activities so they don’t create or heighten tension. That is why the NPP’s
TESCON and the NDC’s TEIN should be taken good care of so they don’t muddy the
water anymore.
Back to these NPP lecturers. What
do they think they have to offer anybody that is not already known? What sort
of desperation is this?
Of course, I’m not in the least
surprised because the NPP is deeply rooted in “booklong” and “rogue” politics,
which continues to be its bane. The NPP people are fixated on “technicalities”
(as we can confirm from the manner in which they are approaching the choice of
a new Chair of the Electoral Commission; complaints about the voters register;
and many other issues that won’t turn the voters’ crank to fall for them at the
polls.
Instead of going to the field to
woo the voters, they are sitting down in their offices and issuing useless
public statements to flog a dead horse; and when told that they are political liabilities,
they flex their muscles to fight. Such characters can’t ever learn any useful
lesson to tilt the table in their favour.
They will form all manner of
groups all over the country but won’t achieve their objective of being in
power, clearly because they continue to detach themselves from the electorate.
Let these lecturers do all they
can at the KNUST. They will end up fighting among themselves soon and hit the
snag to fall on their own swords! A very loud Tweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeea to them,
then!!
I shall return…
·
E-mail:
mjbokor@yahoo.com
·
Join
me on Facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/mjkbokor to continue
the conversation.
No comments:
Post a Comment