Friday,
February 22, 2013
When
Kwame Pianim said before the 2008 elections that any idiot can bear/carry the
flag of a political party, many didn’t understand him. Is he not right, after
all?
Of
course, he was reacting to the rejection of his preferred Presidential
Candidate, Dr. Frimpong-Boateng, by the NPP’s delegates who went for Akufo-Addo
instead. His reaction provoked outrage and was deemed as highly unpalatable by his
critics in the party, some of whom even went to the extent of denying him his
rightful place in the NPP’s pecking order.
Others
called for him to be ostracized. Forget about the insults rained on him. He has
since been dormant in the affairs of the party, at least, as far as his public
utterances about goings-on in the party are concerned.
But
his poignant statement can’t be forgotten, especially when the moments are always
ripe for it to be revisited or recalled to explain contemporary political
developments. I will quote him as far as the word “idiot” in our political
parlance as used by him is concerned. Don’t blame me.
Today,
he seems to be more than vindicated. Of course, he had been right then because
the “idiot” who led the NPP to the 2008 polls lost. And the party has ever
since been struggling to get back on its feet, sort of—if ever it can—because
of too much idiotic happenings at its front.
Again,
the “idiot” was retained to bear the party’s flag at Election 2012, and was
given a more bitter dose of electoral defeat, which has sent him and the entire
leadership of the party into a terrible tailspin. In their state of emotional
turmoil, they have succeeded in turning their front into a “Concert Party” and
their MPs into political straws to cling to in order not to drown.
Not
only are they still bearing the torn flag of the party but they’ve also reduced
it to the status of a tailless kite that can’t fly. Or, that spins out of
control if launched. More commotion than motion!
We
recall that in the 2008 Presidential elections, although the “idiot” bearing
the party’s flag had won the first round with a little over 49% of the total
valid votes cast, he couldn’t hit the benchmark of 50% + 1 vote to win
outright. The kangaroo dance ended abruptly when in the run-off, the good old
Atta Mills swept past him to win with a little over 40,000 votes.
As
an idiot would do, conceding defeat was too difficult for him; and he chose to
go to court to contest the outcome of that obviously genuine electoral defeat only
to be cut to size by the voices of reason in the party—the late B.J. da Rocha
and former President Kufuor.
Lo
and behold, Election 2012 brought along with it bitter memories of 2008, adding
its own brand of torment to the “idiot” who again bore the party’s flag to the
polls. We are long past Election 2012 but he has refused to accept that reality
and is still kicking the hardest as a dying donkey does. And he has the backing
of those like him who think that the law is an ass.
Everything
has gone haywire. Running to the dark chambers of the Supreme Court isn’t
helping them regain their composure because they have by their own actions
complicated matters that will prolong the determination of their petition.
Sadly, that is what they are celebrating.
In
the interim, they must find ways to seek public attention. So, what are they
doing? Boycott… boycott… boycott everything associated with President Mahama!! Desperation
galore. Then, go ahead to make contradictory statements to throw dust into the
eyes of their followers.
But
who are they deceiving if not themselves and these uninformed followers? Here
are the latest instances of how confused they are.
Minority
Leader Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu made an outrageous statement that reflects
sadly on the NPP members’ lack of respect for democracy. Responding to criticisms
that the NPP MPs’ boycott action might not reflect the sentiments of their
constituents whom they represent in Parliament, he retorted that they are not
obliged to consult their constituents on every issue on the floor of the House
before they decide to participate.
He explained, however, that MPs sometimes draw on the views of their constituents on specific issues and that an MP could decide to take a stand on a particular matter before the House, according to the opinion of the majority of his or her constituents.
He explained, however, that MPs sometimes draw on the views of their constituents on specific issues and that an MP could decide to take a stand on a particular matter before the House, according to the opinion of the majority of his or her constituents.
Are
the MPs’ in Parliament at their own volition or they were put there by voters
who withstood the sweltering heat and discomfort on voting day to empower them
so that they could work to solve their problems and uplift living standards?
Are the MPs more powerful than the voters who chose them? Or by boycotting
Parliamentary responsibilities, do these NPP MPs deserve emoluments that the
toil, sweat, and blood of their constituents generate?
As
if that was not enough to confirm his shortsightedness, he added more drivel. We
didn’t miss the equivocation in his stance. As is characteristic of
snakes-under-grass of his type, he said one thing and meant another, thinking
that he could do harm unnoticed or unscathed. How deceived he is!
He
had earlier said that he and his colleagues “reserve the right not to attend
when President Mahama visits the House on Thursday February 21, 2013, to
deliver his first State of the Nation Address.”
In
that same breath, he disclosed that the Minority would defy the party’s directive and
attend the Parliamentary session, even when it was obvious that they couldn’t
just do so without conferring with the National Executive Council of the party.
The party’s leadership had directed them to boycott the session in protest
against the conduct and outcome of Election 2012.
As
he told Joy News’ Elton John Brobbey, “we will see the members in the House
tomorrow.”
Then,
no word on the outcome of the meeting that they were to hold with the NEC.
Thus, in the morning of Thursday, they went through all formalities (beginning
from their own homes) and settled in the chamber of Parliament, creating the
impression that they were indeed ready to participate in proceedings.
But
when all was set for the President to begin delivering his address, they got up
and walked out of the chamber to confirm that their decision on boycott of
official assignments hadn’t been rescinded.
To
confirm their notoriety, some of them carried placards with the inscriptions "stealers"
and "thieves," among others.
Worse than that, though, was the hypocrisy and shallow-mindedness that they displayed thereafter. Only two instances when some opened their mouths were enough to reveal all we need to know about them for what they are.
Worse than that, though, was the hypocrisy and shallow-mindedness that they displayed thereafter. Only two instances when some opened their mouths were enough to reveal all we need to know about them for what they are.
The
MP for Asuogyaman, Kofi Osei Ameyaw and Dr. Kofi Konadu Apraku, who led
Akufo-Addo to electoral defeat in 2008, reacted to the President’s speech and
left no one in doubt about their confused state.
Osei
Ameyaw told Joy News’ Evans Mensah that the NPP was obviously not
satisfied with what came from the President. Thus, “on Tuesday or
Wednesday, the NPP will give an account of the true state of the nation and
will encapsulate the suffering of Ghanaians and provide solutions.”
As
usual, idiocy has taken the better part. A “State of the Nation Address” by sore
losers? Jokers on parade!!
Dr.
Apraku also made some ugly noises, saying that the President's address did not in any way give hope to Ghanaians: "If I was
looking back and I was a young man, is this a government that I can place my
faith in that they can deliver to provide a standard of living that I aspire
to? I did not find that in this speech that he presented."
He
said the issues of concern to Ghanaians on the economy include "the high
interest rate, the high unemployment, the high cost of living and then you can
look into the sectors and look at the water, the energy and the agricultural
sector."
Were
these not the very issues that the President had iterated as what his
government will address in the “Better Ghana Phase Two” agenda? How did Konadu
Apraku process the President’s speech? With anger clouding his sense of hearing
and comprehension?
There
is much happening at the NPP front to prove Kwame Pianim right. We expect more
of those self-defeating machinations because once they have set their wheel of
mischief in motion, it will not stop spinning until the energy catalyzing its
revolution gets exhausted.
We
don’t expect them to end their boycott soon because that is the only means available
to them to continue deceiving their benighted followers that they are fighting
a good cause and should continue to be supported. But most of us know that they
are out of control, wasting their time and energy for nothing.
Once
their “idiot” has borne the party’s flag and led them to an electoral defeat,
refusing to accept the reality and moving the idiocy a notch higher to push
them into the labyrinth of the Judiciary, they will not abandon their
self-destructive line of action in midstream. They will definitely expend their
energies crossing the Rubicon only to worsen their plight. Should we be
surprised? Not at all because that’s what one should expect when an “idiot”
bears a party’s flag on a wild goose chase.
Until
they do irreparable damage to themselves and their party, they won’t recant.
Even when voices of reason emerge to set them right, they will take profound
umbrage and dig in all the more. No LOGIC will make sense to them, as Gabby Asare
Otchere Darko has already confirmed.
In
doing all these acts in desperation, they are dragging their party more into irrelevance.
We saw it after the 1992 general elections. It took them four years to regain
their composure and return to normalcy.
What
they have set in motion now surpasses the previous one and will bring them
nothing but a harvest of woes, anguish, and self-hate. At the end of what I
expect to be a protracted determination
of their bogus lawsuit by the Supreme Court, they may come to realize too late
why the tailless kite that they’ve all
along been running won’t fly.
So
should it be, especially when that kite is in the hands of an “idiot” who fails
to know that what he has in hand is a tailless kite that can’t fly, or that
even if it wants to fly, there is no favourable wind blowing to sustain it in
motion. Wasted effort. Plump!!
I shall return…
·
E-mail:
mjbokor@yahoo.com
·
Join
me on Facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/mjkbokor to continue the conversation.
No comments:
Post a Comment